Court Approval of a Private Composition Act2021-12-17T16:04:05+00:00

Financial difficulties

Home » Specialist areas » Companies in financial distress » Court Approval of a Private Composition Act

Court Approval of a Private Composition Act

The Court Approval of a Private Composition Act (WHOA) came into force on January 1, 2021. This change in the law has significantly altered Dutch insolvency law.

Compulsory composition outside bankruptcy under the WHOA

The WHOA allows a debtor to offer a compulsory composition to creditors and other stakeholders (such as shareholders) that may help avoid bankruptcy. Previously, the possibility to have a compulsory composition declared binding only existed in suspension of payment proceedings or bankruptcy proceedings.

Binding of creditors to WHOA composition

The composition becomes binding on the creditors if the court homologates the composition. Even if creditors have voted against the composition, they can be bound by the composition. One of the requirements of the law is that the composition must be reasonable and fair. The creditors are given the opportunity to vote on the composition and are divided into different classes for this purpose. For example, a mortgagee will be assigned to a different class for the part of his claim that is covered by the mortgage right than a creditor without privilege (i.e. an unsecured creditor).

The content of the composition under the WHOA

The debtor has a great deal of freedom in designing the composition. The proposed composition may entail a change in the rights of those involved (creditors and shareholders). For example, a creditor may have to settle for only partial payment of his claim or conversion of part of the debt into share capital.

Legal regulation of the WHOA

The legislation of the WHOA is quite complex. Various requirements are imposed on the contents of the composition. For example, the expected value of the company after the composition should be stated (the reorganization value), as well as the expected proceeds from the liquidation of the debtor’s assets in the event of bankruptcy (the liquidation value). Valuations should therefore be carried out.

On this basis, the ‘no creditor worse off rule’ can be tested, which means that the court can reject the request for approval of the composition at the request of a creditor if the creditor would be in a worse position as a result of the composition than in the event of liquidation of the debtor’s assets in bankruptcy.

In addition to the debtor, creditors and stakeholders, other persons may also play a role, such as a restructuring expert, observer and other experts to be appointed by the court.

Lawyers counseling WHOA

We are happy to assist you if you wish to offer a composition in order to avoid bankruptcy or if you are faced with a debtor who wishes to offer a composition.

More about Companies in financial difficulties:

Please click further if you would like to know more about how we can advise you on the following areas/topics:

SPECIALIZED LAWYERS

These are our lawyers who are specialized in this area.

Peter de Graaf

+31(0)10 209 27 63
degraaf@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)

Rob Steenhoek

+31 (0)10 209 27 63
steenhoek@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)

Justin de Vries

+31 (0)10 209 27 63
devries@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)

Wat vinden onze cliënten

We hebben al enkele jaren zeer goede ervaringen met LVH advocaten. Het kantoor kenmerkt zich door een gedegen Rotterdamse down-to-earth werkmentaliteit met daarbij een uitstekende kennis van zaken. Bij onze laatste samenwerking heeft Mr. R.C. Steenhoek ons als adviseur bijgestaan tijdens de afwikkeling van een faillissement. Door zijn ruime ervaring als curator is mr. Steenhoek zeer deskundig in deze trajecten. Hij is zeer toegankelijk, weet de belangrijke details te benoemen, denkt vele stappen vooruit  en komt met een duidelijk plan van aanpak. Tijdens de afwikkeling van het faillissement met de curator heeft mr. Steenhoek ons voortreffelijk vertegenwoordigt. We zijn zeer tevreden over het behaalde resultaat en we zijn ervan overtuigd dat zonder zijn expertise we dit niet op deze wijze hadden kunnen afhandelen.

P.E. van Erk

In 2019 en 2020 hebben wij LVH Advocaten benaderd voor een advies om de zaak op een zorgvuldige en deskundige wijze te beëindigen. Dit is volledig op een praktische en binnen een zeer korte periode opgelost. Hij had altijd zijn volledige aandacht voor mijn verhaal. Het is op een zeer nette manier afgehandeld. De samenwerking was perfect!

Met alle dank aan de heer Steenhoek.

Ton Hameeteman

More about companies in financial distress

Termination of banking relationship by bank

September 6, 2022|

It is increasingly common for banks to terminate a relationship with a customer - sometimes dating back many years. Such termination of a banking relationship can have serious consequences for a business owner. Can a bank terminate a credit relationship? When is it allowed and when is it not? Below is a brief explanation of the background to such termination and the rights and obligations of banks and account holders.

Reduction of amount for which the director is liable

July 4, 2022|

A director is liable under article 2:248 paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW) to make good the deficit in the bankruptcy if the board has manifestly mismanaged its duties and it is plausible that this was a major cause of the bankruptcy. Based on paragraph 4 of this article of law, the court can mitigate the amount for which the director is liable under certain circumstances.

The wage guarantee scheme: continued payment of wages in the event of the employer’s bankruptcy

June 27, 2022|

The Unemployment Insurance Act includes a scheme that entitles employees to payment in the event of payment problems on the part of the employer. The regulation is also called the wage guarantee regulation. It also regulates which benefits an employee can claim in case of bankruptcy of the employer. In this article I will discuss the main provisions of the wage guarantee scheme that apply in the event of bankruptcy and I will go into a recent judgment of the Supreme Court on this subject.

Go to Top