Financial difficulties
Court Approval of a Private Composition Act
The Court Approval of a Private Composition Act (WHOA) came into force on January 1, 2021. This change in the law has significantly altered Dutch insolvency law.
Compulsory composition outside bankruptcy under the WHOA
The WHOA allows a debtor to offer a compulsory composition to creditors and other stakeholders (such as shareholders) that may help avoid bankruptcy. Previously, the possibility to have a compulsory composition declared binding only existed in suspension of payment proceedings or bankruptcy proceedings.
Binding of creditors to WHOA composition
The composition becomes binding on the creditors if the court homologates the composition. Even if creditors have voted against the composition, they can be bound by the composition. One of the requirements of the law is that the composition must be reasonable and fair. The creditors are given the opportunity to vote on the composition and are divided into different classes for this purpose. For example, a mortgagee will be assigned to a different class for the part of his claim that is covered by the mortgage right than a creditor without privilege (i.e. an unsecured creditor).
The content of the composition under the WHOA
The debtor has a great deal of freedom in designing the composition. The proposed composition may entail a change in the rights of those involved (creditors and shareholders). For example, a creditor may have to settle for only partial payment of his claim or conversion of part of the debt into share capital.
Legal regulation of the WHOA
The legislation of the WHOA is quite complex. Various requirements are imposed on the contents of the composition. For example, the expected value of the company after the composition should be stated (the reorganization value), as well as the expected proceeds from the liquidation of the debtor’s assets in the event of bankruptcy (the liquidation value). Valuations should therefore be carried out.
On this basis, the ‘no creditor worse off rule’ can be tested, which means that the court can reject the request for approval of the composition at the request of a creditor if the creditor would be in a worse position as a result of the composition than in the event of liquidation of the debtor’s assets in bankruptcy.
In addition to the debtor, creditors and stakeholders, other persons may also play a role, such as a restructuring expert, observer and other experts to be appointed by the court.
Lawyers counseling WHOA
We are happy to assist you if you wish to offer a composition in order to avoid bankruptcy or if you are faced with a debtor who wishes to offer a composition.
More about Companies in financial difficulties:
Please click further if you would like to know more about how we can advise you on the following areas/topics:
SPECIALIZED LAWYERS
These are our lawyers who are specialized in this area.
Peter de Graaf
Furkan Alkilic
Justin de Vries
More about companies in financial distress
The wage guarantee scheme: continued payment of wages in the event of the employer’s bankruptcy
The Unemployment Insurance Act includes a scheme that entitles employees to payment in the event of payment problems on the part of the employer. The regulation is also called the wage guarantee regulation. It also regulates which benefits an employee can claim in case of bankruptcy of the employer. In this article I will discuss the main provisions of the wage guarantee scheme that apply in the event of bankruptcy and I will go into a recent judgment of the Supreme Court on this subject.
Request for debt restructuring and Corona: the tax collector thinks along
Until further notice, the Tax Authorities will approach requests for restructuring of tax debts with a flexible attitude. This applies in particular to requests from entrepreneurs whose businesses are fundamentally sound and who have been affected by the Corona crisis. For these entrepreneurs, the generous corona deferral policy may prove to be of no avail.
Does the WHOA apply to claims by industry pension funds for pension premium arrears?
The Supreme Court recently issued a ruling on the question of whether the Homologation Underhand Agreement Act (WHOA) applies to claims by industry pension funds for pension premium arrears. The question was answered in the negative. This article discusses the judgment.
