Directors’ liability
Being a director means making decisions, including when interests conflict or the company is under pressure. As long as things are going well, risks often remain in the background. But in the event of financial problems, disputes with creditors or bankruptcy, the question may arise whether a director is personally liable.
The law assumes that directors must have room to do business. Not every disappointing decision therefore leads to liability. Personal liability may only arise if a director can be seriously personally blamed.
When does directors’ liability arise?
Directors’ liability can arise in different ways. A director may be liable towards the company for improper management. In bankruptcy, the trustee also investigates whether there are grounds to hold directors liable for the deficit in the estate. For example, late filing of annual accounts or inadequate administration may play an important role.
Creditors can also hold a director personally liable. This may be the case, for example, if the director entered into obligations while knowing, or having reason to know, that the company would not be able to fulfil them. Special rules also apply in relation to the Tax Authorities and industry pension funds. In such situations, it is important to report inability to pay in a timely and correct manner.
Advice on directors’ liability
LVH Advocaten helps directors, companies and creditors with questions about directors’ liability. We assess the facts, map out the risks and advise on the best approach. We also guide directors through financially difficult periods, so that decisions are made carefully and liability risks are limited as much as possible. Because several lawyers at our firm have experience as trustees, we know how these situations are assessed in bankruptcy. Are you being held liable as a director, do you want to hold a director liable or are you uncertain about your position? Feel free to contact us. We will think along with you quickly and practically
Click below to learn more about how we can advise you on the following areas/topics:
SPECIALIZED LAWYERS
These are our lawyers who specialize in this area.
Bouwe Bos
Peter de Graaf
David Harreman
Anouk van Houdt
Jamie Janssen
Laura Kleijne
Jacolien Leuvenink
Gentia Niesert
Ben van Nieuwaal
Richard Ouwerling
Mike Pfeifer
Hans Rijntjes
Rob Steenhoek
Peter Verheijden
Carolina Corijn
Legal assistant
+31 (0)10 209 27 52
corijn@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Anna-Rhodé van den Dool
Ina Erwich
Sebastiaan Knook
Secretary
+31 (0)10 209 27 64
knook@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Irene Nuijen
Administrative Assistant
+31 (0)10 209 27 50
nuijen@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Carola Plomp
Secretary
+31 (0)10 209 27 75
plomp@lvh-advocaten.nl (more…)
Claudia Rondberg
Receptionist
+31 (0)10 209 27 77
rondberg@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Bram van Ruijven
Legal assistant aviation
+31 (0)10 209 27 64
vanruijven@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Maxime Visser
Manager backoffice
+31 (0)10 206 17 84
visser@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Sebastiaan Knook
Legal assistant aviation
+31 (0)10 209 27 52
knook@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Annique Wennekes
More about bankruptcy
Terminating an Agency agreement by the Principal
An agency agreement (“Agency Agreement”) may be terminated with or without cause and below you will find a practicable explanation on which steps need to be considered. Please note that terminating an Agency Agreement may be done through the Cantonal Courts or by taking extra-judicial steps as set out in article 6:265 of the DCC. The EC directive (86/653/EEG) is implemented in the Netherlands in articles 7:428 to 7:455 of the Dutch Civil Code (“DCC”), which is mostly compulsory law, which means that deviation by agreement is generally not possible and that these provisions are overriding. This article will only address the situation where the Principal terminates or rescinds the Agency Agreement. My next article will address the situation of the Agent.
The shareholders’ agreement: what if agreements are not kept?
In my previous contributions "A shareholder agreement to make your startup investor-proof" and "The shareholder agreement: some practical tips" I already wrote about the usefulness and necessity of the shareholder agreement. In order to avoid conflicts with, for example, future investors, it is wise to make good agreements about the cooperation. Not only agreements about the positive aspects of the cooperation, but above all agreements about what should happen if the cooperation does not go as expected.
Bill on Homologation Private Placement Significant change in insolvency law is imminent
A very important change in insolvency law is imminent. This change concerns the possibility of a debtor's offering a composition to creditors. In the current situation, there is only an arrangement for the compulsory imposition by the court of an arrangement with creditors in suspension of payments or bankruptcy. In the Bill on the Homologation of Private Agreements (WHOA), the possibility has been included that a compulsory composition without a moratorium or bankruptcy can be concluded. This will drastically change the possibilities for resolving problematic debts. This change is important for debtors, but also for their providers of capital, such as creditors and shareholders.
