Dutch Act on Court Confirmation of a Private Restructuring Plan (WHOA)
The Dutch Act on Court Confirmation of a Private Restructuring Plan (WHOA) entered into force on 1 January 2021. This legislative change significantly amended insolvency law.
Compulsory restructuring plan outside bankruptcy
The WHOA enables a debtor to offer a compulsory restructuring plan to creditors and other stakeholders, such as shareholders, which can help prevent bankruptcy. Previously, a compulsory restructuring plan could only be declared binding in suspension of payments or bankruptcy.
Binding effect on creditors
The plan becomes binding on creditors if the court confirms it. Creditors may also be bound by the plan even if they voted against it. The law requires, among other things, that the plan must be reasonable and fair. Creditors are given the opportunity to vote on the plan and are divided into different classes for that purpose.
Content of the plan
The debtor has considerable freedom in structuring the plan. The proposed plan may change the rights of those involved, including creditors and shareholders. For example, a creditor may have to accept only partial payment of its claim or conversion of part of the debt into share capital.
Statutory WHOA framework
The WHOA framework is quite complex. The contents of the plan must meet various requirements. It must indicate, for example, the value expected to be realised if the plan is adopted, known as the restructuring value, as well as the proceeds expected in a liquidation of the debtor’s assets in bankruptcy, known as the liquidation value.
On this basis, the court can assess, among other things, the no creditor worse off rule. This means that the court may reject confirmation of the plan at the request of a creditor if that creditor would be placed in a worse position under the plan than in a bankruptcy liquidation.
In addition to the debtor, creditors and stakeholders, other persons may also play a role, such as a restructuring expert, observer or other experts appointed by the court.
Legal guidance on WHOA
We are happy to help if you wish to offer a restructuring plan to prevent bankruptcy or if you are confronted with a debtor who wishes to offer such a plan.
Click below to learn more about how we can advise you on the following areas/topics:
SPECIALIZED LAWYERS
These are our lawyers who specialize in this area.
Bouwe Bos
Peter de Graaf
David Harreman
Anouk van Houdt
Jamie Janssen
Laura Kleijne
Jacolien Leuvenink
Gentia Niesert
Ben van Nieuwaal
Richard Ouwerling
Mike Pfeifer
Hans Rijntjes
Rob Steenhoek
Peter Verheijden
Carolina Corijn
Legal assistant
+31 (0)10 209 27 52
corijn@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Anna-Rhodé van den Dool
Ina Erwich
Sebastiaan Knook
Secretary
+31 (0)10 209 27 64
knook@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Irene Nuijen
Administrative Assistant
+31 (0)10 209 27 50
nuijen@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Carola Plomp
Secretary
+31 (0)10 209 27 75
plomp@lvh-advocaten.nl (more…)
Claudia Rondberg
Receptionist
+31 (0)10 209 27 77
rondberg@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Bram van Ruijven
Legal assistant aviation
+31 (0)10 209 27 64
vanruijven@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Maxime Visser
Manager backoffice
+31 (0)10 206 17 84
visser@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Sebastiaan Knook
Legal assistant aviation
+31 (0)10 209 27 52
knook@lvh-advocaten.nl
(more…)
Annique Wennekes
More about bankruptcy
Terminating an Agency agreement by the Principal
An agency agreement (“Agency Agreement”) may be terminated with or without cause and below you will find a practicable explanation on which steps need to be considered. Please note that terminating an Agency Agreement may be done through the Cantonal Courts or by taking extra-judicial steps as set out in article 6:265 of the DCC. The EC directive (86/653/EEG) is implemented in the Netherlands in articles 7:428 to 7:455 of the Dutch Civil Code (“DCC”), which is mostly compulsory law, which means that deviation by agreement is generally not possible and that these provisions are overriding. This article will only address the situation where the Principal terminates or rescinds the Agency Agreement. My next article will address the situation of the Agent.
The shareholders’ agreement: what if agreements are not kept?
In my previous contributions "A shareholder agreement to make your startup investor-proof" and "The shareholder agreement: some practical tips" I already wrote about the usefulness and necessity of the shareholder agreement. In order to avoid conflicts with, for example, future investors, it is wise to make good agreements about the cooperation. Not only agreements about the positive aspects of the cooperation, but above all agreements about what should happen if the cooperation does not go as expected.
Bill on Homologation Private Placement Significant change in insolvency law is imminent
A very important change in insolvency law is imminent. This change concerns the possibility of a debtor's offering a composition to creditors. In the current situation, there is only an arrangement for the compulsory imposition by the court of an arrangement with creditors in suspension of payments or bankruptcy. In the Bill on the Homologation of Private Agreements (WHOA), the possibility has been included that a compulsory composition without a moratorium or bankruptcy can be concluded. This will drastically change the possibilities for resolving problematic debts. This change is important for debtors, but also for their providers of capital, such as creditors and shareholders.
