Financial difficulties
Filing for bankruptcy
An entrepreneur, who may be a private individual, can file for bankruptcy with the court by himself or bankruptcy can be declared by the court at the request of a creditor. A general partnership or a legal entity can apply for insolvency and can be declared insolvent by the court at the request of a creditor. These are two separate procedures and different requirements apply to both procedures.
Bankruptcy applied for by individual
A lawyer is not required to file a declaration of bankruptcy. However, it is wise to consult with an attorney in the phase immediately preceding the decision to file for bankruptcy to determine whether the risks of continuing the business are (too) great or whether quitting is the best option.
If quitting the business is the best option, it should be determined whether filing for bankruptcy is the appropriate course of action as there are other options that are worth considering. A lawyer can also explain the procedure for filing bankruptcy and prepare the business owner for the role of a trustee.
Bankruptcy applied for by a creditor
If a creditor wants to file for the bankruptcy of a debtor, he must instruct a lawyer to do so. The request is sent to the competent court, after which the court summons the debtor.
How to file for bankruptcy by an individual
After filing a self-declaration or after sending a request for bankruptcy to the court, the debtor is heard in a courtsession closed to the public. The court can declare bankruptcy if the debtor is ‘in the stage of not being able to pay’. There must be ‘summary evidence’ of facts or circumstances that the debtor can no longer pay. If the proceedings are instituted at the request of a creditor, summary evidence of the creditor’s right of action is also required.
Finally, the debtor must prove by providing basic evidence that he is unable to pay debs by presenting several unpaid debts (the support claims). By using the word “basice evidence,” the legislature indicates that normal rules of evidence do not apply. A bankruptcy hearing is a short procedure in which there is little room for detailed evidence. The existence of the right of action and the existence of the supporting claim(s) must be shown after a short and simple examination.
LVH Attorneys & Insolvency
The attorneys at our Rotterdam office have extensive experience in filing for bankruptcy and insolvency, and in defending against bankruptcy petitions. In addition, they have experience as bankruptcy trustees themselves.
We will be happy to help you if you are considering filing for bankruptcy, want to file for bankruptcy of a debtor or want to defend against a bankruptcy petition.
More about Companies in financial difficulties:
Please click further if you would like to know more about how we can advise you on the following areas/topics:
SPECIALIZED LAWYERS
These are our lawyers who are specialized in this area.
More about companies in financial distress
The position of the SME entrepreneur as a creditor in a WHOA arrangement
On 1 January 2021, the Homologation Underhand Arrangement Act (WHOA) entered into force. This law introduced a new restructuring instrument. Its purpose is to prevent companies from being declared bankrupt while they are still (partially) viable. The statutory scheme includes a minimum protection for (smaller) SMEs. This is also referred to as the 20% rule. In this article I will explain the position of the SME as a creditor in a WHOA settlement.
Can a cash payment made after the bankruptcy date be reclaimed?
Recently, the Supreme Court issued an interesting judgment involving two important principles of bankruptcy law, namely the principle of fixation and the principle of paritas creditorum. The case concerned a situation in which, after the bankruptcy date, a cash payment was made from the bankrupt's bank account to a creditor. The central question was whether the trustee could recover the payment from the creditor. This article discusses the case, the relevant principles and the Supreme Court's opinion.
Surveillance in the (home) workplace: what is an employer allowed?
Previously we wrote an article about the rules for camera surveillance in the workplace. The need for employer monitoring exceeds - partly in view of the corona pandemic - the mere checking of the workplace with cameras. Employers also have a need to monitor employees' browsing habits, as well as the emails they send. And, of course, they want to prevent employees from spending hours Internet shopping and watching TV at the home workplace during working hours. But isn't monitoring this a violation of the employee's privacy, especially at the home workplace? In this article, we address that question. Is an employer allowed to use monitoring tools and what rules must the employer abide by during a monitoring. To form a clear picture, we will also discuss case law.


